Download Article
Join our upcoming conferences for groundbreaking insights and global collaboration!
Register TodayIntegrating the United Nations sustainable development goals into organizational strategy: A sustainability balanced scorecard approach using ANP and TOPSIS 2022, 3 (1): 1-18 DOI 10.37357/1068/jso/3.1.01
Tobias Rösner
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Logistics, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Christina Bredebach
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Logistics, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Challenges related to sustainable development require companies to align their strategies to meet stakeholder interests systematically. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are guiding objectives for sustainable development on an international level up to 2030. This article links the goals of the SDGs to a recognized strategic management tool: the sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC). So far, few approaches exist in this field. Consequently, this article presents a framework for developing and applying an SBSC that takes an integrative view of the SDGs. For this purpose, the analytic network process (ANP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution are applied (TOPSIS). The article concludes that the solution approach presented has considerable potential to support organizations in systematically integrating the SDGs into their strategy. Also, this article proposes interesting future research directions.
- World Commission on Environment and Development: editor (1987) "Our common future," 1st ed. Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford Paperbacks. 416 p. ISBN: 978-0-19-282080-8
- Costanza R, Daly L, Fioramonti L, Giovannini E, Kubiszewski I, et al. (2016) "Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals" Ecol Econ (vol. 130, pp. 350–355) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009
- General Assembly (2015) "Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" New York, USA, United Nations (UN). (https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/291/89/PDF/N1529189.pdf?OpenElement) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Pizzi S, Caputo A, Corvino A, Venturelli A (2020) "Management research and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A bibliometric investigation and systematic review" J Clean Prod (vol. 276, pp. 124033) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124033
- Rickels W, Dovern J, Hoffmann J, Quaas MF, Schmidt JO, et al. (2016) "Indicators for monitoring Sustainable Development Goals: An application to oceanic development in the European Union" Earths Future (vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 252–267) https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000353
- United Nations (UN) (2022) "Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development" SDG Indic (https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- General Assembly (2017) "Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" New York, USA, United Nations (UN). (https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N17/207/63/PDF/N1720763.pdf?OpenElement) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Sachs JD (2012) "From millennium development goals to Sustainable Development Goals" The Lancet (vol. 379, no. 9832, pp. 2206–2211) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0
- Mio C, Panfilo S, Blundo B (2020) "Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review" Bus Strategy Environ (vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 3220–3245) https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2568
- Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) "The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action," 1st ed. Massachusetts, United States, Harvard Business Review Press. 336 p. ISBN: 978-0-87584-651-4
- Figge F, Hahn T, Schaltegger S, Wagner M (2002) "The sustainability balanced scorecard - linking sustainability management to business strategy" Bus Strategy Environ (vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 269–284) https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339
- Mook L (2019) "The Sustainable Development Goals: A tipping point for impact measurement?" Can J Nonprofit Soc Econ Res (vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 81–89) https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser.2019v10n2a343
- Mook L (2020) "Performance management, impact measurement and the sustainable development goals: The fourth wave of integrated social accounting?" Can J Nonprofit Soc Econ Res (vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 15–15) https://doi.org/10.29173/cjnser.2020v11n2a353
- Pereira Ribeiro JM, da Silva SA, da Silva Neiva S, Soares T, Montenegro C, et al. (2021) "A proposal of a balanced scorecard to the water, energy and food nexus approach: Brazilian food policies in the context of sustainable development goals" Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess (vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 129–146) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01769-1
- Sarkar S, Singh P (2019) "Strategising CSR in addressing sustainable development goals using a scorecard approach" World Rev Sci Technol Sustain Dev (vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 313–329) https://doi.org/10.1504/WRSTSD.2019.104095
- Köksalan M, Wallenius J, Zionts S (2016) "An early history of multiple criteria decision making" In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira JR - editors. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys New York, USA, Springer - pp. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_1
- Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z, Kildienė S (2014) "State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods" Technol Econ Dev Econ (vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 165–179) https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
- Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira JR (2005) "Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys," 1st e. New York, USA, Springer New York. 1048 p. ISBN: 978-0-387-23081-8 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Eisenführ F, Weber M, Langer T (2010) “Rational decision making,” 1st ed. Berlin, Germany, Springer Berlin. 447 p. ISBN: 978-3-642-02850-2 (https://link.springer.com/book/9783642028526) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Marshall JD, Toffel MW (2005) "Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: A sustainability hierarchy" Environ Sci Technol (vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 673–682) https://doi.org/10.1021/es040394k
- Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability" Bus Strategy Environ (vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 130–141) https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
- Elkington J (1997) "Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business," 1st ed. Minnesota, United States, Capstone Publishing Ltd. 407 p. ISBN: 978-1-900961-27-1
- Idowu SO, Capaldi N, Zu L, Gupta AD (2013) "Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility," 1st ed. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer Berlin. 2772 p. ISBN: 978-3-642-28035-1 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Nzila C, Dewulf J, Spanjers H, Tuigong D, Kiriamiti H, et al. (2012) "Multi criteria sustainability assessment of biogas production in Kenya" Appl Energy (vol. 93, pp. 496–506) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.020
- Guangdong Wu, Duan K, Zuo J, Zhao X, Tang D (2017) "Integrated sustainability assessment of public rental housing community based on a hybrid method of AHP-entropy weight and cloud model" Sustainability (vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 603) https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040603
- Lozano R (2008) "Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally" J Clean Prod (vol. 16, no. 17, pp. 1838–1846) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008
- Dalal-Clayton B, Bass S (2002) "Sustainable Development Strategies: A resource book," 1st ed. Virginia, USA, Routledge. 384 p. ISBN: 978-1-85383-947-4
- Schaltegger S, Burritt R, Petersen H (2003) "An introduction to corporate environmental management: Striving for sustainability," 1st ed. Sheffield, United Kingdom, Greenleaf Publishing Ltd. 384 p. ISBN: 1-874719-65-9
- Epstein MJ, Wisner PS (2001) "Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability" Environ Qual Manag (vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–10) https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.1300
- Freeman RE, Reed DL (1983) "Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance" Calif Manage Rev (vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 88–106) https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018
- Mio C, Costantini A, Panfilo S (2022) "Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use" Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag (vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 367–384) https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2206
- Belton V, Stewart TJ (2002) "Multiple criteria decision analysis:An integrated approach," 1st ed. New York, USA, Springer New York. 372 p. ISBN: 978-1-4615-1495-4 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4)
- Korhonen P, Moskowitz H, Wallenius J (1992) "Multiple criteria decision support - A review" Eur J Oper Res (vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 361–375) https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90155-3
- Hwang C-L, Yoon K (1981) "Multiple attribute decision making," 1st ed. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer Berlin. 269 p. ISBN: 978-3-642-48318-9 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Triantaphyllou E (2000) "Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study," 1st ed. New York, USA, Springer New York. 290 p. ISBN: 978-1-4757-3157-6 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Cristóbal Mateo JRS (2012) "Multi criteria analysis in the renewable energy industry" London, United Kingdom, Springer London. 106 p. ISBN: 978-1-4471-2345-3 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4471-2346-0)
- Kumar A, Sah B, Singh AR, Deng Y, He X, et al. (2017) "A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development" Renew Sustain Energy Rev (vol. 69, pp. 596–609) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.191
- Saaty TL (2006) "The analytic network process" In: Saaty TL, Vargas LG - editors. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks Massachusetts, USA, Springer US - pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6_1 (https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6_1) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Saaty TL, Takizawa M (1986) "Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks" Eur J Oper Res (vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 229–237) https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90184-0
- Saaty TL (2016) "The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making" In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira JR - editors. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys New York, USA, Springer New York - pp. 363–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_10 (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_10) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Saaty RW (2016) "Decision making in complex environments: The Analytic Network Process (ANP) for dependence and feedback," 1st ed. Florida, USA, Rozann W. Saaty. 187 p. ISBN: 1-888603-00-3 (https://www.superdecisions.com/sd_resources/v28_man02.pdf)
- Blockus M-O (2010) “Komplexität in Dienstleistungsunternehmen: Komplexitätsformen, Kosten- und Nutzenwirkungen, empirische Befunde und Managementimplikationen,” 1st ed. Wiesbaden, Germany, Gabler Verlag Wiesbaden. 353 p. ISBN: 978-3-8349-8958-1 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-8349-8958-1) Accessed: 18 February 2022
- Chen S-J, Hwang C-L (1992) "Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications," 1st ed. Heidelberg, Germany, Springer Berlin. 536 p. ISBN: 978-3-642-46768-4 (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4)
- Shih H-S, Shyur H-J, Lee ES (2007) "An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making" Math Comput Model (vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 801–813) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
- GRI, UN Global Compact, and WBCSD (n.d.) "Inventory of business indicators" SDG Compass (https://sdgcompass.org/business-indicators/) Accessed: 15 February 2022
- Niemira MP, Saaty TL (2006) "An analytic network process model for financial-crisis forecasting" In: Saaty TL, Vargas LG - editors. Decision making with the analytic network process: Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks Massachusetts, USA, Springer US - pp. 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6_3 (https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6_3) Accessed: 18 February 2022
The author(s) has received no specific funding for this article/publication.